Google Pixel 9 Specs
Launch |
---|
Announced | 2024, August 13 | ||
Status | Available. Released 2024, August 22 |
Pricing |
---|
128 GB | 256 GB | 512 GB | 1 TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Flipkart | NA | 79,999 | NA | NA |
Amazon | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Jio Mart | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Reliance Digital | NA | 79,999 | NA | NA |
Vijay Sales | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Croma | NA | 79,999 | NA | NA |
Display |
---|
Type | OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 2700 nits (peak) | ||
Size | 6.3 inches, 94.7 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | ||
Resolution | 1080 x 2424 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~422 ppi density) | ||
Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | ||
Always-On display |
Platform |
---|
OS | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades | ||
Chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) | ||
CPU | Octa-core (1×3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3×2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4×1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) | ||
GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 |
Main Camera |
---|
Double | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31″, 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/1.7, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55″, dual pixel PDAF | ||
Features | Single-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take | ||
Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
Front Camera |
---|
Single | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1″, 1.22µm, PDAF | ||
Features | Auto-HDR, panorama | ||
Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Memory |
---|
Internal | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | ||
UFS 3.1 | |||
Card slot | No |
Body |
---|
Dimensions | 152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) | ||
Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | ||
Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | ||
SIM | Nano-SIM and eSIM | ||
IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
Network |
---|
Technology GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G 2G bands GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 3G bands HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 4G bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 – G2YBB 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71, 75 – GUR25 5G bands 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave – G2YBB 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 – GUR25 Speed HSPA, LTE (CA), 5G |
Sound |
---|
Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | ||
3.5mm jack | No |
Comms |
---|
WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | ||
Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | ||
Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | ||
NFC | Yes | ||
Radio | No | ||
USB | USB Type-C 3.2 |
Features |
---|
Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | ||
Satellite SOS service Circle to Search |
Battery |
---|
Type | Li-Ion 4700 mAh, non-removable | ||
Charging | 27W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 55% in 30 min (advertised) 15W wireless (w/ Pixel Stand) 12W wireless (w/ Qi compatible charger) Reverse wireless |
Misc |
---|
Colors | Obsidian, Porcelain, Wintergreen, Peony | ||
Models | G2YBB, GUR25, G1B60 |
Tests |
---|
Performance | AnTuTu: 1071616 GeekBench: 4535 | ||
Display | 2232 nits max brightness (measured) |
Detailed Review of Google Pixel 9 |
---|
The Google Pixel 9 is an excellent flagship smartphone that balances solid performance with Google’s advanced software and camera capabilities. Released in August 2024, the phone boasts a 6.3-inch OLED display, Google Tensor G4 chipset, dual rear camera system (50 MP + 48 MP), and a 4700 mAh battery. Here’s a detailed breakdown of its performance across various categories.
Display
Score: 92/100
The 6.3-inch OLED display on the Pixel 9 features a resolution of 1080 x 2424 pixels and a 120 Hz adaptive refresh rate. This makes scrolling, animations, and gaming smooth and responsive. The display’s peak brightness of 2700 nits ensures exceptional visibility in bright conditions, and HDR10+ support enhances the video experience with vivid colors and deep blacks. The screen is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus 2, offering durability against scratches and drops.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Bright display with a peak brightness of 2700 nits | PWM flicker might affect sensitive users |
120 Hz adaptive refresh rate for smooth visuals | Slightly lower resolution compared to some competitors |
HDR10+ support for superior contrast and colors | No major design change compared to previous models |
Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for strong protection | Some users may prefer a higher screen-to-body ratio |
Design and Build
Score: 90/100
The Pixel 9 sports a premium design with a glass back and metal frame, giving it a sleek yet durable feel. At 198 grams and 8.5 mm thick, the phone feels substantial without being too heavy. The device is IP68-rated for water and dust resistance, ensuring reliability in tough environments. Available in White, Black, Green, and Pink, it offers aesthetic variety.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Sturdy and premium build with metal and glass materials | Slightly thicker than some competitors at 8.5 mm |
IP68 water and dust resistance | No major changes in design compared to previous versions |
Lightweight for its size at 198 grams | No headphone jack or infrared port |
Available in multiple color options | Lack of bundled charger |
Performance
Score: 67/100
Powered by the Google Tensor G4 chipset, the Pixel 9 offers solid day-to-day performance, with an 8-core CPU and Mali-G715 MP7 GPU. It is capable of handling multitasking, streaming, and light gaming, but it lags behind some competitors in terms of raw performance in intensive applications and games. The 4 nm architecture ensures power efficiency, although the Thermal performance can be less consistent under heavy load.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Efficient 4 nm architecture | Lags behind other flagship chipsets like Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
Handles everyday tasks smoothly | GPU performance underwhelming for heavy gaming |
Decent performance for most users | Tends to heat up under prolonged heavy usage |
Benchmarks
Score: 67/100
In benchmark tests, the Pixel 9’s Google Tensor G4 achieves moderate scores:
- Geekbench 6 (Single-Core): 1747
- Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core): 4535
- AnTuTu Benchmark 10: 1,071,616
While these scores are competitive, the Pixel 9 ranks 150th on the AnTuTu 10 benchmark list, lagging behind devices with Qualcomm Snapdragon or Apple’s A-series processors.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Competitive single-core and multi-core performance | Falls behind top-performing flagships in benchmarks |
Decent AnTuTu score | Lower AnTuTu ranking at 150th place |
Suitable for moderate usage | Not ideal for power users or heavy gamers |
Memory
Score: 92/100
The Pixel 9 comes with 12 GB of LPDDR5 RAM and storage options of 128 GB or 256 GB. The UFS 3.1 storage ensures fast read and write speeds. Unfortunately, there is no support for expandable storage via a microSD card.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
12 GB of fast LPDDR5 RAM | No microSD card support |
UFS 3.1 storage for faster data access | Limited to 128/256 GB storage variants |
Software
Score: 91/100
Running Android 14, the Pixel 9 offers a pure, bloatware-free Stock Android experience with regular updates and the latest Google features. The clean interface ensures smooth performance and timely software updates, which is a significant advantage for users who prefer the Android ecosystem.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Stock Android 14 for a clean user experience | Limited customization options compared to other Android skins |
Regular and timely software updates | Some users may miss additional features found in custom UIs |
Google’s latest AI-driven features | Few pre-installed apps might be missed by some users |
Battery
Score: 71/100
The Pixel 9 has a 4700 mAh battery that supports 27W fast charging, 12W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging. It offers 55% charge in 30 minutes but takes 1 hour 25 minutes for a full charge. Battery life is decent, with 21 hours of general use and 13 hours of video playback, though it falls short in gaming.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Good general battery life with 4700 mAh capacity | 27W charging is slower compared to some flagship devices |
Wireless and reverse wireless charging supported | No bundled charger |
55% charge in 30 minutes | Takes 1:25 hours for a full charge |
Main Camera
Score: 85/100
The Pixel 9 features a 50 MP primary camera and a 48 MP ultrawide lens. While it doesn’t support 8K video recording, it offers 4K recording at 60 FPS and 1080p slow motion at 240 FPS. Photos are sharp, with excellent color accuracy and dynamic range, thanks to optical image stabilization (OIS).
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Excellent photo quality with 50 MP resolution | No 8K video recording |
OIS for stable images and videos | Digital zoom, no optical zoom |
4K video recording at 60 FPS | No significant improvement over Pixel 8 |
DxOMark Main Camera Tests
Score: 154/100
In DxOMark camera tests, the Pixel 9 scored 161 in photo quality and 150 in video quality, making it a solid performer. It achieved high marks for bokeh, preview, and zoom capabilities, with a strong overall score of 154.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Strong DxOMark scores for photo and video quality | Zoom performance is average |
High marks in bokeh and preview | Ultrawide performance not as strong as competitors |
Selfie Camera
Score: 90/100
The 10.5 MP front camera captures high-quality selfies with phase autofocus and digital stabilization. It supports 4K video recording at 60 FPS and delivers good results even in low light.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Sharp, high-quality selfies with autofocus | No significant upgrades over the previous model |
4K video recording at 60 FPS | Minor noise in low-light selfies |
Connectivity
Score: 95/100
The Pixel 9 supports Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3, and USB-C 3.2 for fast data transfer and charging. It also has 5G and eSIM support. The only missing feature is an infrared port.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3 for fast connectivity | No infrared port |
5G and eSIM support | No expandable memory |
USB-C 3.2 for fast data transfer and charging | No headphone jack |
Sound and Speakers
Score: 90/100
The Pixel 9 features stereo speakers that offer good sound quality but lacks Dolby Atmos support and a headphone jack. The speakers are clear and loud but could be more immersive.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Stereo speakers provide clear audio | No Dolby Atmos |
Loud and clear sound | No headphone jack |
Pros and Cons Summary Table
Feature | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Display | Bright display, 120 Hz refresh rate, HDR10+ support | Slightly lower resolution, no major design changes |
Design and Build | Premium materials, IP68 rating, multiple color options | No headphone jack, slightly thicker, no bundled charger |
Performance | Efficient processor, solid everyday performance | Lower performance than competitors, thermal issues |
Benchmarks | Decent single-core and multi-core scores | Lags behind in benchmarks, especially GPU |
Memory | 12 GB LPDDR5 RAM, UFS 3.1 storage | No expandable memory |
Software | Stock Android 14, regular updates | Limited customization |
Battery | Decent battery life, wireless charging | Slow charging, no bundled charger |
Main Camera | Excellent photo quality, 4K video recording | No 8K video, average zoom |
DxOMark | High photo and video scores | Average ultrawide and zoom performance |
Selfie Camera | Sharp selfies, 4K video recording | Minor low-light noise |
Connectivity | Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3, USB-C 3.2, 5G support | No infrared port, no headphone jack |
Sound | Clear stereo speakers | No Dolby Atmos, no headphone jack |
Google Tensor G4 Chipset: Detailed Review |
---|
The Google Tensor G4, launched in August 2024, is a flagship-grade 8-core chipset built on a 4-nanometer process by Samsung. With a Mali-G715 MP7 GPU, it offers solid AI capabilities, efficient performance, and high-speed connectivity. Let’s take an in-depth look into each aspect, including benchmarks and real-world performance metrics.
CPU
The Google Tensor G4 features an 8-core CPU architecture, consisting of:
- 1x Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.1 GHz for performance-heavy tasks.
- 3x Cortex-A720 cores at 2.6 GHz for efficient multi-core performance.
- 4x Cortex-A520 cores at 1.92 GHz for energy efficiency in day-to-day tasks.
This structure ensures a balance between performance and power efficiency. The ARMv9.2-A instruction set enhances processing, and the 4 nm process technology results in better thermal management and lower power consumption.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Efficient 4 nm process reduces power consumption | Performance lags behind newer Qualcomm Snapdragon competitors |
Balanced core setup for diverse tasks | Lacks in raw multi-core performance compared to rivals |
ARMv9.2-A architecture for enhanced instruction handling | Thermal throttling can be observed under sustained workloads |
GPU: Mali-G715 MP7
The Mali-G715 MP7 GPU utilizes the Valhall 4th-gen architecture and is designed for modern gaming and graphical applications. With 7 pipelines, 192 shading units, and a clock speed of 940 MHz, the GPU supports Vulkan 1.3 and OpenCL 2.0, ensuring compatibility with high-end gaming and advanced graphics rendering. However, its performance is slightly underwhelming in extremely intensive gaming scenarios.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Supports Vulkan 1.3 for advanced gaming and graphics | Struggles with ultra-high settings in graphic-intensive games |
940 MHz clock speed provides good graphics capabilities | Falls behind GPUs like Adreno in gaming benchmarks |
2526.7 GFLOPS computational power | Not ideal for extreme gaming performance |
AnTuTu 10 Benchmark
In the AnTuTu 10 benchmark, the Tensor G4 scored 1,323,184, with the CPU scoring 394,284 and the GPU 453,826. This places it in a solid position among flagship chipsets, though it’s not at the top of the leaderboard.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
High overall AnTuTu score of over 1.3 million | Slightly behind Snapdragon and Apple chips in AnTuTu rankings |
Strong CPU and GPU performance in daily use | Lacks the top-tier benchmark scores seen in higher-end flagships |
GeekBench 6 Benchmark
In GeekBench 6, the Tensor G4 achieved a Single-Core score of 2005 and a Multi-Core score of 4835, which demonstrates good single-core performance but leaves room for improvement in multi-core tasks, especially when compared to the latest Snapdragon processors.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Solid single-core performance for general tasks | Multi-core score lags behind rivals like Apple’s A17 Bionic |
Good balance between efficiency and performance | Not ideal for tasks requiring sustained high multi-core usage |
AI Accelerator
The Tensor G4 includes an advanced Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI and machine learning tasks. This improves the phone’s ability to handle complex image processing, voice recognition, and real-time translations with faster speeds and lower power consumption.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Fast and efficient AI performance with dedicated NPU | Not as advanced as Apple’s Neural Engine |
Excellent for machine learning tasks and camera processing | AI tasks still slightly behind newer Qualcomm NPUs |
Memory
The Google Tensor G4 supports LPDDR5X memory with a frequency of 4200 MHz, and a maximum bandwidth of 64 Gbps, making it extremely efficient in multitasking and handling large workloads. It can handle up to 16 GB of RAM, ideal for future-proofing the device for demanding applications.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Supports LPDDR5X with high bandwidth and fast speeds | Some competing chips offer faster DDR5 memory options |
Efficient memory handling for multitasking and gaming | 16 GB max memory may limit extreme use cases in future devices |
Multimedia (ISP)
The Image Signal Processor (ISP) on the Tensor G4 allows the device to support 8K video capture at 30 FPS and 4K video at 120 FPS. It supports modern video codecs like H.264, H.265, AV1, and VP9, making it versatile for streaming and video processing. The chipset also supports UFS 3.1 and UFS 4.0 for fast storage performance.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Supports 8K and 4K video recording with top-tier codecs | 8K video recording is still niche and has limited use |
Compatibility with modern audio and video codecs | Performance drops slightly in extreme multimedia tasks |
Connectivity
In terms of connectivity, the Tensor G4 includes:
- Exynos 5400 modem with full 5G support.
- Wi-Fi 7 for the latest and fastest wireless speeds.
- Bluetooth 5.3 for improved energy efficiency and faster transfer rates.
- GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, and Galileo for comprehensive global navigation.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3 for the latest connectivity | No support for mmWave 5G in some regions |
Full 5G and multi-band navigation support | The Exynos modem can be less efficient than Qualcomm alternatives |
Info
The Google Tensor G4 is categorized as a flagship chipset. It was officially announced in August 2024, and is expected to power high-end devices for 2024 and beyond.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Flagship-grade chipset for premium smartphones | Faces stiff competition from Apple and Qualcomm chips |
Reliable performance for day-to-day and advanced tasks | Not the absolute leader in any single area of performance |
Pros and Cons Summary Table
Feature | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
CPU | Efficient core structure, 4 nm process, balanced performance | Lags in multi-core tasks, thermal throttling observed |
GPU: Mali-G715 MP7 | Supports Vulkan 1.3, 940 MHz clock, good general graphics capabilities | Struggles with high-end gaming, not the top performer |
AnTuTu 10 | High overall score of 1.3 million, good CPU and GPU scores | Falls behind Qualcomm in benchmark rankings |
GeekBench 6 | Strong single-core performance | Multi-core performance not as high as competitors |
AI Accelerator | Advanced NPU for fast AI processing and camera tasks | Slightly behind the competition in AI tasks |
Memory | LPDDR5X memory, 64 Gbps bandwidth, supports up to 16 GB RAM | Max memory size could limit future potential |
Multimedia (ISP) | 8K and 4K video support, UFS 4.0 for fast storage | 8K recording remains niche, minor performance drops in multimedia |
Connectivity | Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3, full 5G and multi-band navigation support | Exynos modem slightly less efficient than Qualcomm’s solutions |
Info | Flagship-grade chipset for high-end smartphones | Faces stiff competition from top-end chipsets like Apple A17 Bionic |
Also read the iphone 15 review – Click here to read the Iphone 15 Review
What do you think?
It is nice to know your opinion. Leave a comment.